Nikola Basic vs Patrik Jurina Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L W L L L
Form
W L L W L W L W W LHead-2-Head: Basic 1 - 0 Jurina
They have played 2 sets in total, with Basic winning 2 and Jurina winning 0. The last match between Basic and Jurina was at the M25 Maribor, 31-08-2023, First, Clay with Nikola Basic getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nikola Basic | 1 |
| Patrik Jurina | 0 |
M25 Maribor(31-08-2023)
6
3
6
4
| Basic | Stats | Jurina |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (9-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 23 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 53% (77-69) | Career Total W/L | 42% (11-15) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shelton VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tiafoe VS Muller PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Nikola Basic
Player
Patrik Jurina
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
41 of
80)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:2:0 | Average Match Time | 2:2:0 |
| 69% (45/65) | 1st Serve % | 51% (41/80) |
| 56% (25/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (24/41) |
| 60% (12/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (14/39) |
| 35% (6/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (3/8) |
| 53% (42/80) | Return Points Win % | 43% (28/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nikola Basic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Nikola Basic
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Nikola Basic
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
Player
Nikola Basic
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
28 of
40)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikola Basic
Player
Nemanja Malesevic
71%
(
60 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-3 12-10 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Nikola Basic
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
72%
(
60 of
83)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(10) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nikola Basic
Player
Vlado Jankanj
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikola Basic
Player
Andrea Fiorentini
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
77
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Popovic
Player
Nikola Basic
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikola Basic
Player
Gabriel Matuszewski
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve %
56%
(
14 of
25)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Patrik Jurina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nikola Basic
Player
Patrik Jurina
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
41 of
80)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrik Jurina
Player
Luka Videnovic
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrik Jurina
Player
Tamas Foldi
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 2-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Patrik Jurina
Player
Nicolo Toffanin
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
18%
(
3 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matej Dodig
Player
Patrik Jurina
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve %
52%
(
13 of
25)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
33
Total Points Won
14
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrik Jurina
Player
Ante Cikojevic
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
105)
2
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
22 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
39 of
105)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(10) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Patrik Jurina
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (77/69) | Win/Loss | 42% (11/15) |
| 53% (175/158) | Sets Win/Loss | 44% (25/32) |
| 51% (1632/1542) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (262/277) |
| 61% (25/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (52/52) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (11/14) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 71 | Aces Total | 43 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 192 | Total Double Faults | 51 |
| 1:7:43 | Average Match Time | 1:9:17 |
| 241.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 174.77 |
| 62% (3758/6042) | 1st Serve % | 56% (664/1176) |
| 59% (2208/3758) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (457/664) |
| 49% (1128/2284) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (242/512) |
| 47% (302/643) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (45/106) |
| 43% (2554/5990) | Return Points Win % | 39% (450/1143) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 53% (77/68) | Futures W/L | 46% (11/13) |
| 52% (75/144) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (11/26) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (11/24) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 46% (19/41) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 86% (77/66) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (12/11) |
| 14% (77/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (12/1) |
| 16% (69/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (14/0) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
